Effectiveness of Monetary Policy Transmission on Credit and The Real Sector from An Islamic Monetary Perspective

Authors

  • Muslim Marpaung Medan State Polytechnic
  • Irma Suryani Lubis Medan State Polytechnic
  • Syahrial Arif Hutagalung Medan State Polytechnic

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.59890/ijefbs.v4i5.53

Keywords:

Monetary Transmission, Sharia Financing, Real Sector

Abstract

The effectiveness of monetary policy in a dual banking system cannot be adequately assessed through interest rate changes, credit growth, or increased Islamic financing. A more fundamental question is whether changes in monetary conditions generate additional productive activity with equitable risk distribution. This article aims to explain the barriers to monetary transmission to credit and the real sector and formulate policy improvements based on an Islamic monetary perspective. The research employs a critical integrative literature review with a targeted search of academic publications and official documents available through October 22, 2026. The analysis compares mechanisms, findings, identification limitations, and institutional relevance; no new econometric estimates are performed. The synthesis shows that evidence regarding the response of Islamic financing to monetary policy is heterogeneous, while changes in financing volume do not necessarily prove additional output or welfare. The article develops a four-layered evaluation framework encompassing price transmission, quantity, allocation, and real impact. Within this framework, Islamic monetary principles are translated into linking transactions to economic activity, risk sharing according to contracts, cost transparency, and protection of vulnerable business actors. Proposed solutions include liquidity incentives based on additional productive financing, strengthening Islamic money markets, reporting financing costs according to contracts, partnership financing supported by cash flow data, and benchmark-based impact evaluation. The article's contribution lies in linking transmission effectiveness with allocation quality and impact accountability, not in claiming automatic superiority of Islamic banking.

References

Bank Indonesia. (2025a). Bank Indonesia Regulation Number 9 of 2025 concerning Macroprudential Liquidity Incentive Policy. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/peraturan/Pages/PBI_092025.aspx

Bank Indonesia. (2025b). Regulation of the Members of the Board of Governors Number 27 of 2025 concerning the Implementation Regulations for the Macroprudential Liquidity Incentive Policy. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/peraturan/Pages/PADG_272025.aspx

Bank Indonesia. (2026). Regulation of the Members of the Board of Governors Number 22 of 2026 concerning Amendments to Regulation of the Members of the Board of Governors Number 27 of 2025 concerning the Implementation Regulations of the Macroprudential Liquidity Incentive Policy. https://www.bi.go.id/id/publikasi/peraturan/Pages/PADG_222026.aspx

Bernanke, B. S., & Gertler, M. (1995). Inside the black box: The credit channel of monetary policy transmission. Journal of Economic Perspectives, 9 (4), 27–48. https://doi.org/10.1257/jep.9.4.27

Chapra, M. U. (1985). Towards a just monetary system: A discussion of money, banking and monetary policy in the light of Islamic teachings. The Islamic Foundation.

El Hamiani Khatat, M. (2016). Monetary policy in the presence of Islamic banking (IMF Working Paper No. 16/72). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475523942.001

Fikri, RJ (2019). Monetary transmission mechanism under dual financial system in Indonesia: Credit-financing channel. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 4 (2), 251–278. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v4i2.1001

Hasan, Z. (2026). Monetary policy transmission to Islamic bank financing in Indonesia: Evidence from a Structural VAR approach. Issues and Perspectives in Business and Social Sciences, 6 (2), 488–505. https://doi.org/10.33093/ipbss.2026.6.2.18

Imam, P., & Kpodar, K. (2015). Is Islamic banking good for growth? (IMF Working Paper No. 15/81). International Monetary Fund. https://doi.org/10.5089/9781475569285.001

Islamic Financial Services Board. (2025). Islamic financial services industry stability report 2025. https://www.ifsb.org/wp-content/uploads/2025/05/IFSI-Stability-Report-2025.pdf

Jordà, Ò. (2005). Estimation and inference of impulse responses by local projections. American Economic Review, 95 (1), 161–182. https://doi.org/10.1257/0002828053828518

Kammer, A., Norat, M., Piñón, M., Prasad, A., Towe, C., & Zeidane, Z. (2015). Islamic finance: Opportunities, challenges, and policy options (IMF Staff Discussion Note No. 15/05). International Monetary Fund. https://www.imf.org/external/pubs/ft/sdn/2015/sdn1505.pdf

Financial Services Authority. (2023). Roadmap for the development and strengthening of Indonesian Islamic banking 2023–2027. https://ojk.go.id/id/Publikasi/Roadmap-dan-Pedoman/Syariah/Perbankan-Syariah-Indonesia/Pages/Roadmap-Pengembangan-dan-Penguatan-Perbankan-Syariah-Indonesia-2023-2027.aspx

Snyder, H. (2019). Literature review as a research methodology: An overview and guidelines. Journal of Business Research, 104 , 333–339. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jbusres.2019.07.039

Umam, K., Ismail, AG, Tohirin, A., & Sriyana, J. (2021). Islamic endogenous money: Evidence from the Islamic banking system in Indonesia and Malaysia. Journal of Islamic Monetary Economics and Finance, 7 (3), 545–560. https://doi.org/10.21098/jimf.v7i3.1351

Zulkhibri, M., & Sukmana, R. (2017). Financing channels and monetary policy in a dual banking system: Evidence from Islamic banks in Indonesia. Economic Notes, 46 (1), 117–143. https://doi.org/10.1111/ecno.12076

Published

2026-10-29

How to Cite

Marpaung, M., Lubis, I. S., & Hutagalung, S. A. (2026). Effectiveness of Monetary Policy Transmission on Credit and The Real Sector from An Islamic Monetary Perspective. International Journal of Economic, Finance and Business Statistics, 4(5), 801–814. https://doi.org/10.59890/ijefbs.v4i5.53